Herbicide resistance in broad-leaved weeds (BLW) is relatively rare when compared to resistance in grass weeds such as blackgrass or ryegrass, but incidence is on the increase and there is concern that it may now be found in further species. First identified in the year 2000, target site resistance to aceto-lactate synthase inhibitor herbicides (ALS) is most common in poppy, chickweed and mayweed. Triazinone-resistant groundsel populations have also been discovered in UK asparagus fields, but to date, ALS resistance in groundsel has not yet been identified.
The problem remains confined mainly to the ALS herbicides, namely the sulfonylureas and the triazolopyrimidines. Both herbicide groups are extremely important for cereal broadleaf-weed control in the spring and together represent greater than 60% of the area treated. Currently, control of ALS resistant weeds is dependant on the continued availability of herbicides with alternative modes of action, such as fluroxypyr, MCPA, halauxifen and pendimethalin.
However, there is always a risk that key active ingredients may be lost as products come up for regulatory renewal, making control of resistant populations more difficult, exacerbating the pressure on existing molecules.
Herbicide resistance occurs naturally in the population, it is the inherited ability for a weed to survive a herbicide application that would normally control it. Surviving plants then pass on the genetic advantage to future generations, until resistant plants dominate the population, making weed control challenging.
There is often no single factor in the development of resistance and a combination of factors may be at play. Repeated use of herbicides with a single mode of action across the rotation will encourage resistance development. Similarly, lack of tank-mixing with herbicides of an alternative mode of action may cause the same outcome.
Failing to implement an effective rotation, monocropping and ignoring instances of poor weed control will also increase the likelihood of resistance.
Early detection of resistance relies on keeping good farm records and observing and recording what happens in the field. Signs of herbicide resistance include:
Healthy plants alongside dead plants of the same species following a herbicide application.
Poor control of a susceptible weed species, whilst other susceptible weeds are well controlled.
A gradual decline in control over several years.
Sudden appearance of weed species not previously seen.
Poor weed control is not always down to resistance though. Suboptimal use rates, targeting weeds that are too large or applying herbicides in very cold or dry conditions, will also affect the performance of a herbicide. This is especially true of Acetolactate synthase (ALS) inhibitor herbicides, which interfere with protein biosynthesis and require the target weed to be actively growing for maximum effectiveness. Other factors affecting herbicide performance include application conditions and increased leaf waxing, which may occur after prolonged cold periods resulting in the inability of the herbicide to penetrate the plant effectively.
Mainly confined to the east of England, ALS resistant poppies have been identified in over 13 counties. Studies of these UK populations have confirmed that resistance is conferred by the target site mutations Pro-197-Leu and Pro-197-His. These populations can no longer be controlled by the sulfonylurea herbicides such as metsulfuron-methyl and tribenuron-methyl.
To control ALS resistant poppy populations, a programmed approach that includes pendimethalin, cinmethylin, picolinafen, MCPA and herbicides containing Arylex™ active, namely Pixxaro® and Zypar®, will be effective. Care must be taken to ensure that the poppies are treated early and when small as even the activity of extremely effective herbicides will drop off as weeds grow beyond 10cm diameter and into stem extension.
Resistant populations are more widespread than poppy, with over 50 ALS resistant populations identified across England, Scotland and Northern Ireland.
It is believed that the high frequency of resistant chickweed in Scotland and Northern Ireland may be linked to continuous spring barley cropping and over-reliance on the sulfonyl-urea herbicides for broad-leaved weed control.
Two different ALS target site mutations have been identified; Pro-197-Gln and Trp-574-Leu. The Pro-197-Gln mutation is the most common and is associated with the sulfonylurea herbicides only. The Trp-574-Leu mutation confers resistance to both. Effective control of ALS resistant chickweed can be gained by using fluroxypyr, found in Corteva’s Pixxaro, Spitfire® or Starane® Hi-Load.
Confirmed cases of resistant mayweed remain small in number and confined to two counties in England and Scotland. It is believed that incidences are under- reported currently. Analysis of the Scottish population confirmed that resistance was conferred by the Proline 197-Gln mutation. Clopyralid containing products such as Shield Pro™ will control resistant populations.
Hugh Guinan, Field Technical Manager at Corteva Agrisciences, has this advice:
Target weeds when small and actively growing. For weeds such as ALS poppy, control should start in the autumn with pendimethalin or cinmethylin and follow up in the spring with an alternative mode of action such as Arylex (found in Pixxaro or Zypar).
If you are applying complicated, multi-way tank mixes, don’t be tempted to split out the herbicides if there are too many products in the tank. Keep the herbicides together.
Minimise the use of ALS herbicides in the rest of the rotation, only use them where you really need them.
Maintain good spray records and always investigate cases of poor weed control.
Consider spraying off patches of poorly controlled weeds before seed set if you suspect resistance. This will avoid seed return and problems later down the line.
Collect seed or tissue samples and get them tested if resistance is suspected.
Insights and updates will be shared throughout the season. For further information, please contact our hotline on 0800 689 8899, e-mail: ukhotline@corteva.com or send us an enquiry using this online form.
All brand names are trademarks of other manufacturers for which proprietary rights may exist. All manufacturers' tradenames and trademarks are duly acknowledged.